Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ä¡¸é¿­±¸Àü»öÁ¦ »ç¿ë½ÇÅÂ¿Í ÀνĿ¡ °üÇÑ Á¶»ç

A SURVEY ON THE USING STATUS AND PERCEPTION OF PIT AND FISSURE SEALANT

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2009³â 36±Ç 1È£ p.53 ~ 61
ÃÖÁ¤ÀÎ, ÀÌ»óÈÆ, ±è¿µÀç, ÇѼ¼Çö, ±èÁ¾Ã¶, ±èÁ¤¿í, Àå±âÅÃ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÃÖÁ¤ÀΠ( Choi Jung-In ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç ¹× Ä¡Çבּ¸¼Ò
ÀÌ»óÈÆ ( Lee Sang-Hoon ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
±è¿µÀç ( Kim Young-Jae ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç ¹× Ä¡Çבּ¸¼Ò
ÇѼ¼Çö ( Hahn Se-Hyun ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç ¹× Ä¡Çבּ¸¼Ò
±èÁ¾Ã¶ ( Kim Chong-Chul ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç ¹× Ä¡Çבּ¸¼Ò
±èÁ¤¿í ( Kim Jung-Wook ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç ¹× ÀÓ»óÄ¡ÀÇÇבּ¸¼Ò
Àå±âÅà( Jang Ki-Taeg ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç ¹× ÀÓ»óÄ¡ÀÇÇבּ¸¼Ò

Abstract

Ä¡¸é¿­±¸Àü»öÁ¦ÀÇ ¹°¼ºÀº °³¼±µÇ¾î ¿Ô°í °áÇÕ°­µµ, ħÅõµµ, ¹Ì¼¼´©Ã⠵ °ü·ÃµÈ ¿¬±¸°¡ È°¹ßÈ÷ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö°í ÀÖÀ¸³ª ±¹³»¿¡¼­ÀÇ Ä¡¸é¿­±¸Àü»öÁ¦ »ç¿ë½ÇÅÂ¿Í Ä¡°úÀÇ»çÀÇ ÀνĿ¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸´Â °ÅÀÇ ¾ø´Â ½ÇÁ¤ÀÌ´Ù. ±×·¡¼­ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© À̸¦ ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°ú Àü°ø °³¿øÀÇ¿Í ºñ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°ú °³¿øÀǸ¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Á÷Á¢ ¹æ¹®À» ÅëÇØ Á¶»ç¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÑ °á°ú ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù. 1. Ä¡¸é¿­±¸Àü»öÀÇ Ä¡¾Æ¿ì½Ä ¿¹¹æÈ¿°ú¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÀÇ¿¡¼­´Â ¿µ±¸Ä¡¿Í À¯Ä¡¿¡ ¸ðµÎ È¿°ú°¡ ÀÖ´Ù´Â ÀÀ´äÀÌ 96.7%·Î ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ°í, ¹Ý¸é ºñ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÀÇ¿¡¼­´Â ¸ðµÎ¿¡ È¿°ú°¡ ¾ø´Ù°í »ý°¢ÇÏ´Â ÀÀ´äÀÌ 13.5%·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 2. Ä¡¸é¿­±¸Àü»ö ½Ã ¹æ½À¹ýÀ¸·Î ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÀÇÀÇ 100%, ºñ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÀÇÀÇ 27%°¡ ·¯¹ö´ïÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ°í, bonding agent¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â ºñÀ²Àº ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÀÇ 83.3%, ºñ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÀÇ 40.5%·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 3. ¹ý¶ûÁú ¼ºÇü¼úÀÇ ½ÃÇàºñÀ²Àº ºñ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÀÇ¿¡¼­ ¾à°£ ´õ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ°í, ½ÃÇà¹æ¹ý¿¡¼­´Â µÎ ±º °£¿¡ Å« Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. 4. Ä¡¸é¿­±¸Àü»ö ½ÇÆÐÀÇ ¿øÀÎÀ¸·Î´Â ºÎÀûÀýÇÑ ¹æ½ÀÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ ¿À¿°ÀÌ °¡Àå ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ°í ´ÙÀ½À¸·Î ¿ì½Ä »ó¹æ¿¡ µµÆ÷, ³·Àº °­µµ, ³·Àº È帧¼º, °úÃæÀü ¼øÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 5. ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÀÇÀÇ °æ¿ì ¿¹¹æÀû ·¹Áø¼öº¹À» ¹Ù¶÷Á÷ÇÏ°Ô »ý°¢ÇÏ´Â ºñÀ²ÀÌ 90%·Î ³ô¾Ò°í, Ä¡¸é¿­±¸Àü»öº¸´Ù ¿¹¹æÀû ·¹Áø¼öº¹À» ÇÏ´Â ºñÀ²ÀÌ ´õ ³ôÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.

The property of pit and fissure sealant has been improved and many studies on the bond strength, penetration, microleakage have been published. But there are few studies on the using status and perception of pit and fissure sealant within the country. Therefore, this study made a survey on it. Pedodontists and non-pedodontists were surveyed by interview. The Results were as follows; 1. On caries prevention effect, 96.7% of the pedodontists replied that sealants were effective on both permanent teeth and primary teeth. On the other hand, 13.5% of the non-pedodontists replied that sealants weren¡¯t effective on both. 2. All of the pedodontists and 27% of the non-pedodontists used rubber dams. 83.3% of the pedodontists and 40.5% of the non-pedodontists used bonding agents. 3. Non-pedodontists used enameloplasty more frequently than Pedodontists but the pattern was not significantly different. 4. The causes of sealant failures included salivary contamination, caries under sealant, low strength, low flowability, overfilling. 5. In the pedodontists, 90% replied that PRR application was desirable and PRR applications were more frequent than sealant application.

Å°¿öµå

Ä¡¸é¿­±¸Àü»ö; ¿ì½Ä¿¹¹æÈ¿°ú; Àüó¸®; ÀçÄ¡·á; ¿¹¹æÀû ·¹Áø¼öº¹
Pit and fissure sealant; Caries prevention effect; Pretreatment; Retreatment; Preventive resin restoration

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI